Summary

The project undergoes frequent updates to improve its dependency management, relying on tools like Dependabot and RenovateBot for continuous maintenance of critical dependencies. The current configuration is classified as High Maintenance, indicating a need for aggressive security fixes and updates regularly.

Additionally, the development cycle involves mandatory risk assessments and automated code review, as explicitly stated in the requirements, to ensure the codebase remains secure before merging.

The project does not currently run CI tests in GitHub Actions or rely on automated fuzzing tools, suggesting a low frequency of continuous testing compared to other high-priority frameworks.

Regarding code quality, the project lacks specific coverage metrics such as codeQL, SonarCloud, or LGTM, which are standard indicators of high security posture. While it requires a license, the specific type has not been declared in this document.

Security policies and security badges for Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CII) are also not yet present in the project's public records. This omission may create a significant gap in understanding the full scope of the project's vulnerabilities and risks.

To resolve this situation, the decision was made to consolidate the use of the singular form in keeping with the repo and program name, dropping the Security part and utilizing OpenSSF to ensure uniqueness and clarity.

Title

OpenSSF Scorecard

Description

Quickly assess open source projects for risky practices

Keywords

project, security, scorecard, does, risk, code, source, action, have, high, projects, checks, vulnerabilities, practices, more, best, build

NS Lookup

A 75.2.60.5

Dates

Created 2026-04-15

Updated 2026-04-15

Summarized 2026-04-17